01
Source and collection boundaries
Prefer legitimate, attributable business sources. Do not circumvent logins or restricted access. Record URLs, retrieval dates, terms or licensing restrictions and confidence.
D2 GROUP / RESEARCH DECISION GUIDE
A company record may contain public business facts and personal information about named employees. Public visibility does not remove privacy obligations. Research buyers should agree the allowed sources, purpose, retention and review responsibilities before any contact data is collected or used.
Published & reviewed: 25 October 2026 · D2 GROUP B2B Research
Direct answer
Define the lawful purpose and relevant jurisdictions before processing personal contact data, collect only fields required for the agreed Sales Research task, document source and collection dates, respect exclusions and suppression, restrict access, set retention/deletion rules and review outreach separately. A publicly visible professional email is not automatically permission to send marketing messages. This is operational guidance, not a legal determination of compliance.
D2 distinguishes company-level facts from individual contact data and a research handoff from a decision to contact someone. Each project needs jurisdiction-specific review rather than blanket claims that all public data is safe.
Controls should be proportional to the information involved and reviewed under applicable law and organizational policy.
01
Prefer legitimate, attributable business sources. Do not circumvent logins or restricted access. Record URLs, retrieval dates, terms or licensing restrictions and confidence.
02
Differentiate organization name/sector from a named person's professional contact details. Collect only needed business role and verified contact fields; avoid private numbers, personal inboxes and sensitive attributes.
03
Specify why fields are processed, the receiving team, access limitations, secure delivery route, correction workflow and deletion/retention schedule. A preview page is not a substitute for access control.
04
Assess local rules for electronic messages, notice requirements, opt-outs, suppression and cross-border transfers. Sales outreach requires its own lawful basis and channel review.
No. Publication alone does not establish an outreach legal basis or satisfy opt-out, notice and channel-specific rules. Assess applicable law and suppression separately.
Not necessarily. Other identifiers can still point to a person, and data retention/access controls remain important.
The parties should document responsibilities and a defensible retention period under applicable rules and the contract, including correction and deletion procedures.
These related pages explain scope, evidence, QA and monthly engagement. Observed business signals are not confirmed purchase intent, and accepted research is not a booked meeting.
Have an ICP and exclusions? Discuss a scoped research brief without uploading confidential CRM data to a public form.
Discuss your research scopeDiscuss geography, allowed evidence sources, necessary contact fields and delivery controls; use a secure approved channel for confidential requirements.
Discuss responsible research scopeThis page explains a research method and illustrative fields; it is not an outcome guarantee, quote or permission to send outreach.
EVIDENCE / INFERENCE / GAP
Use the matrix to scope research and escalate uncertain personal-data use; it is not a jurisdiction-specific legal opinion.
| Gate or category | Supporting evidence | Disposition |
|---|---|---|
| Company facts | Public company website, sector, legal entity, facilities and dated business announcements | Record source/license and dates; verify entity accuracy and correct mistakes. |
| Professional contact data | Named role, corporate email or business phone tied to an identifiable person | Limit collection to necessity; record provenance, access, retention and suppression checks. |
| Sensitive or nonpublic data | Private email, personal mobile, access-controlled databases, health/financial details or confidential CRM exports | Do not add by default; obtain legal review and explicit authorization or exclude from scope. |
Write down client objective, jurisdictions, data categories and allowed sources with a responsible owner.
Use necessary fields only, attach source and date, mark inferred identities as unverified, and avoid access controls or data harvesting beyond permission.
Apply appropriate access, secure link handling, review restrictions and vendor/client responsibilities before releasing identifiable contacts.
Provide a process for corrections, objections, suppressions, deletion and retention expiry, with project-specific legal review.
All companies and events below are fictional structural examples, not researched prospects, verified contact records, client cases or Sales outcomes.
Review criteria