ICP & selection
Who the client wants to reach and why this company qualifies.
B2B Lead Intelligence · Sample deliverable
Not just a company name, a generic email and a spreadsheet row. Explore a complete research dossier: whom the account fits, what the evidence actually says, who owns the purchasing decision, which contact gates must pass and what Sales can do next.
D2 · DATA CONTRACT
46
Illustrative fields across six research groups
EXAMPLE ONLY · FICTIONAL ACCOUNT · NO REAL CONTACT INFORMATION
Direct answer
A completed B2B Lead Intelligence record identifies a company that fits the client's agreed ICP, documents why it qualifies with attributable sources and freshness context, maps a relevant named buyer, includes that person's verified DIRECT professional email with VALID contact status, checks exclusions and duplicates, and gives Sales a clear next action. L2/L3 research may add dated observed signals, opportunity hypotheses and counter-evidence; those layers are not proof of a purchase. Incomplete buyer/contact records remain research output and are not counted as completed leads.
RESEARCH ANATOMY
These are the blocks Sales and RevOps should be able to inspect before accepting a lead. The demo does not assert that its example data is real.
Who the client wants to reach and why this company qualifies.
Identified company, activity, location, sources and freshness.
Relevant purchasing function, named buyer and independent direct-email QA.
What was observed, when, where, and which claims remain unknown.
Offer-to-problem fit, hypothesis, counter-evidence and limitations.
Status, exclusions, freshness rules and the next sales action.
L1 / L2 / L3
L1, L2 and L3 are research depth choices, not three different promises of meetings. Completed-lead acceptance still requires a named buyer and verified direct professional email.
L1
ICP, source-backed company qualification, relevant named buyer and verified DIRECT contact.
No buying signal required
L2
All L1 gates plus time-bound searches for observable trigger signals and relevance.
NO_VERIFIED_SIGNAL is a valid result
L3
L2 evidence and a testable commercial opportunity thesis with counter-evidence.
Hypothesis—not a guaranteed deal
Field-level data contract
A research handoff is useful only when each field explains the sales decision it supports. Source references and statuses in this demo are non-operational placeholders.
Illustrative electronics manufacturer · Đồng Nai, Vietnam
The client's fictional ICP
Supplier of industrial electrical switchgear looking for manufacturing plants with on-site electrical distribution and suitable engineering/procurement buying roles in Southern Vietnam.
Names and facts below are invented solely to demonstrate fields. A real QA_PASS requires independently verified business sources, a current named buyer and a verified DIRECT work email.
The dossier below is 100% illustrative. Its company, events, names, dates, source IDs and contact fields are placeholders—not researched companies, verified signals or deliverable-ready contacts. Real client records and direct emails stay private.
SOURCE → FACT → INFERENCE → SALES
Multi-signal means reconciled evidence, not merely attaching many links. A researcher records what the source supports and what it does not.
Identifies company, location and business model; the demo intentionally has no live URL.
Could justify checking equipment relevance; the demo does not confirm any real expansion.
A commercial hypothesis pending engineering discovery, not a confirmed budget.
Find current named people and verify direct business emails separately.
Only accepted, verified records enter the counted completed-lead set.
RAW LIST VS RESEARCH
| Criteria | Ordinary data list | D2 research handoff |
|---|---|---|
| Account qualification | Company category or filter match | ICP decision, exclusions, operating evidence, WHY_SELECTED |
| Who to contact | Generic inbox or guessed title | Named relevant buyer and verified DIRECT work email |
| Why now | Generic "high intent" label | Observed dated facts and distinct NO_VERIFIED_SIGNAL option |
| Sources and freshness | Unclear source and crawl date | Source IDs, observed/verified dates and missing-evidence flags |
| Opportunity notes | Automatically written sales pitch | Solution fit, counter-evidence, UNKNOWNs and question to verify |
| Acceptance | Rows counted as leads | PASS, CONTACT_GAP, BUYER_GAP, NOT_FIT or REVIEW with QA trace |
QUALITY GATES
A company may be relevant and have strong signals, yet still be held. Account fit cannot compensate for missing named-buyer and direct-email validation.
The account satisfies all must-have filters; competitors, duplicates and excluded segments are checked.
Material company/qualifying facts have suitable provenance; stale or ambiguous data is flagged.
A current, relevant named person is confirmed for an accepted buying function.
The named person's direct work email is verifiable; a guessed address or generic inbox is not enough.
QA_PASS / SALES_READY only when required gates pass; otherwise CONTACT_GAP, BUYER_GAP, REVIEW or NOT_FIT.
ANONYMIZED PRODUCTION EVIDENCE
A separate anonymized Vietnam technology-solutions pilot in October 2026 demonstrates why research and completed leads must be counted separately. These real cohort totals do not validate the fictional dossier above.
55
Accounts researched
24
Accounts eligible under ICP
15
Accepted for handoff
9
Eligible but held for direct-contact gaps
This is one pilot's QA denominator, not a market average, booked meetings, replies or revenue. Individual real client account names, buyer identities, direct emails and private source trails are not public.
Read the real anonymized pilot evidenceFAQ
No. It is a deliberately fictional example that documents the structure, field descriptions and QA rules only. Public evidence about actual completed research is linked separately without disclosing client-private contacts.
Phone is included when explicitly agreed and supportably verified. L1 needs ICP fit and validated buyer/direct email; L2/L3 add deeper signal and opportunity research as the scope requires. A valid outcome may be NO_VERIFIED_SIGNAL.
No. Signals are sourced observations. A project announcement, tender or job opening can inform timing but not guarantee budget, purchase approval, a reply or a signed contract.
Real named-person business contact details and customer project context belong to a private, access-controlled handoff. This demonstration neither publishes them nor pretends placeholders are verified.
Only after agreed ICP and exclusions pass, current named buyer is validated and that person's DIRECT professional email has VALID status. CONTACT_GAP/BUYER_GAP records remain separately visible and uncounted.
The delivery structure, required evidence fields and CRM mapping are scoped with the client. Export format and optional fields depend on the accepted research brief and delivery workflow.
D2 B2B LEAD INTELLIGENCE
Share what you sell, the target market, ICP and exclusions, buyer functions, required evidence and contact gates. D2 can assess a bounded 15-lead test and an acceptance contract before production.
Discuss a 15-lead research testVietnam is the currently Supported target market. Other destinations require documented research/contact feasibility. Managed outreach and appointment setting are not included in the standard intelligence service.