Preserve raw evidence
Keep original marketplace exports or API snapshots for the period before transformation.
D2 Tools · Commerce Evidence
Check whether your Orders, finance, Ads, product-cost and operating evidence are sufficient for the P&L scope you want to publish — without uploading the files or turning missing evidence into zero.
Direct answer
Core readiness starts with Orders, settlement/finance, historical SKU cost, stable identifiers, period rules and an exception register. Ads, Affiliate/creator and fulfillment become required only when those economics are included in the management view.
Reporting scope
Evidence model
Keep original marketplace exports or API snapshots for the period before transformation.
Standardize IDs, time zones, currencies and state labels without erasing source semantics.
Connect order, SKU, finance and historical cost records through stable keys.
Bridge sales-period activity to settlement-period deductions and cash realization.
Use only cost layers supported by the selected management scope and evidence.
Keep unknown or unresolved rows visible with ownership before publishing decision views.
Claim boundaries
An export can exist but still miss the identifiers, period, amount semantics or scope required for the P&L question.
Orders explain commercial activity; finance/settlement explains realized deductions and payout timing. They should reconcile, not collapse into one date basis.
A sold SKU without a valid historical cost is incomplete economics and should block affected profitability claims.
Created, settled and paid timestamps can legitimately fall in different periods. Timing rules must be checked before calling a difference wrong.
Platform attribution can support media analysis but does not replace the spend and revenue basis used for contribution reporting.
Affiliate, fulfillment, promotion or other variable-cost sources become required when the declared contribution scope includes them.
The tool assesses evidence readiness for an operating model; it does not certify statutory accounting, tax treatment or audited financial statements.
A controlled evidence set improves measurement quality but does not imply that the marketplace business is profitable or will improve.
FAQ
For a basic management P&L, start with Orders, settlement/finance evidence and a controlled SKU cost master, plus stable identifiers, explicit period rules and an exception register. Add Ads, Affiliate/creator and fulfillment evidence when those costs are inside the reporting scope.
No. This public version is a browser-side evidence-readiness checklist. It asks whether the required evidence and controls exist; it does not upload, parse or store the user's files.
Orders explain what sold and when. Settlement or finance evidence explains recorded deductions, refunds or adjustments, payable state and payout timing. A P&L and cash reconciliation need those questions kept distinct.
Only when post-Ads contribution or paid-media economics are in scope. The checker makes Ads a required source when the user enables that scope.
No. It becomes required when creator/Affiliate economics are included in the contribution scope. Material paid booking, sample, usage-rights or amplification costs may need separate evidence beyond platform commission.
Not safely when cost changes over time. Historical reporting should resolve each sold SKU or bundle to the valid cost record for the transaction period using effective dates or another documented historical rule.
Keep those rows in an exception state and treat the affected contribution view as incomplete. Do not use zero or a shop average merely to make the report complete.
They may use different business timestamps. Orders can be created in one period and settled, adjusted or paid in another. Compare them through reconciliation bridges, not by assuming same-calendar-month totals must match.
All required evidence has been addressed, but at least one required source or control is only partial. The P&L may support a narrower decision if the limitation is explicitly declared, but it should not be presented as fully reconciled.
At least one required source or control is explicitly missing. The missing item should be restored before making the profitability claim that depends on it.
No. READY means the declared evidence/control checklist is complete enough to proceed with modeling. The actual data still needs validation, mapping, reconciliation and formula review.
Automate after the manual evidence model is stable: source contracts are understood, identifiers are reproducible, period rules are declared and exceptions can be surfaced rather than hidden.
Citation-ready methodology
This contract is the source of truth for the tool semantics: formulas/rules, inputs, outputs, limitations and a worked example. When calculation logic changes, the methodology version must move with the code.
Worked example
Input
Declare Orders, settlement and historical COGS as controlled, but leave stable SKU mapping unresolved.
Output
The checker keeps the model blocked or conditional rather than treating the unresolved mapping as zero-cost evidence.
Interpretation
Resolve the mapping before treating a SKU contribution result as decision-ready.
How to cite this tool
D2 Group. “Marketplace P&L File Checker — methodology and calculation contract.” Version 2026.09, reviewed 2026-09-03. https://d2group.co/tools/marketplace-pnl-file-checker#methodology